All posts by amynomous

This country always helped the poor

In his letter, “Democrats need to grow up,” William Hollins writes: “For the past eight years Democrats were in control of this country and we have gone downhill.” I don’t know what country Hollins has been living in, but based upon his comments, it surely wasn’t the U.S. And as for how the Republican Congress treated President Obama, it is the opposite of what he remembers. Almost seven of the eight years Obama was in office, Republicans controlled Congress. They were very vocal about their desire to ensure that Obama failed. When he was re-elected for a second term I don’t think there were a half-dozen times that the Republican Congress supported him.

Hollins’ belief that if members of Congress will not support the president, they need to be replaced, has merit. Unfortunately, most of the Republican congressional members were not replaced and remain in office.

The only hope the U.S. has to return to what the nation was founded upon is that Republicans do not support Trump. We began as a country of immigrants. When neighbors were in need, they were given help. When they needed medical attention, doctors took care of them whether they could pay or not. Now Trump wants to gut programs that help the poor with plans to cut food stamps and Medicaid.

I would highly recommend that Hollins do some thorough research about the past seven years in Washington and what our country was like when it was founded.

Deanna Nicosia

Editors Note: this article has been re-posted with the author’s permission and originally appeared here.

Your 56th District Candidates

Having followed the two Democratic candidates running for the open 56th district House of Delegates seat for the past few months, I’ve had a chance to listen to them speak at several Indivisible Louisa and Louisa Democratic Committee meetings. Watched them demonstrate their poise, passion and willingness to be forceful advocates for social and economic justice in public forums.

So here’s an examination of their positions just before the primaries.

Most of you reading this already know they participated in two “Meet the Candidates” forums with the six Republicans candidates running for this seat. The first of these meetings was held at the Mineral VFW last month, and covered by our local paper the Central Virginian. And while their take of what happened that night may have gotten many of the details, it was noticeably light on the nuances, something which caught the attention of the Democrats attending that evening.

Two weeks later, they printed all of the candidate’s responses to five questions about how they would represent the people of Louisa County in the House of Delegates. Given the space restraints on any detailed responses, its worth noting that Melissa Dart’s and Lizzie Drucker-Basch’s answers were well formed and nuanced. So without further ado, here’s the first question;

Why do you want to represent Louisa County as a delegate?

 Melissa Dart

In traveling around the 56th district, I’ve heard many concerns about educational funding, access to affordable health care and environmental quality. And many people I’ve spoken with have been affected by the General Assembly’s refusal to expand Medicaid. I will do everything within in my power for all families [in the 56th] to have access to the healthcare, education and resources that they need to support themselves and their families

And at the second candidate forum held at Goochland High School last week, she added “With everything happening in our world and our community, I’m compelled to speak for everyone, but most of all, for those who are not in a position to speak for themselves.”

Lizzie Drucker-Basch

People are more important than party, and I will bring common sense solutions that will improve people’s quality of life. As a small business owner and a background in social work, I firmly believe that you can serve the community while running a successful business and the two are not mutually exclusive!

For years, the 56th District has been largely ignored, and it’s time to start to legislate quality of life issues such as adequate funding for accessible health care, education, clean drinking water and air, broadband for everyone, particularly in the rural areas.

Also at the second candidate forum, Lizzie followed up on those remarks with the observation “We can’t do this in sound bites, we have different ideas…. But what we need to focus on most are the values that we have in common.”

And now the second question; Which regulations would you change to strengthen the state’s job and business climate?

 Melissa Dart

We need to lower barriers for small businesses, and level the playing field between them and large corporation, especially when it comes to taxes.  Remarks she expanded on at the second candidate forum, where she talked about removing corporate loopholes, ensuring that everyone pays their fair share.  And continuing with her interview with the CV she elaborated on the need to devote resources to retraining workers in new and emerging technologies and jobs if we are to be successful now and in the future.

And at the second candidate forum, she talked about the myth of environmental regulations keeping businesses from prospering, saying “I don’t accept that,” and without sensible regulations to protect the air we breathe, our water, and the food we eat, what would be the true cost ?

Lizzie Drucker-Basch

When talking with the CV, she said we should examine regulations on an individual basis, asking are they effective and achieving their purpose? And recognize that small businesses have more financial and practical difficulties with implementing regulations than large corporations, and that we need to consider the consequences of those regulations. She also added that she I believes in continuing the Governor’s work in expanding Virginia as a pro business state.

(Editor’s Note: since the Great Recession in 2009 Virginia has slipped from first place to thirteenth)

The third question; What will you do to improve the quality and access to health care in Louisa and the surrounding area?

Melissa Dart

It’s time for increased transparency so patients can make the best choices about where they receive care, most insurance plans encourage doctors and hospitals to treat illness rather than maintain health. It’s time for the state to encourage [insurance] contracts which keep Virginians healthier and keep more of their money in their pockets.

Lizzie Drucker-Basch

Consumer protections from insurance companies, there should be no discrimination because of pre-existing conditions and putting people in high risk pools. And by keeping people insured and maintain their health, and not have to rely on emergency rooms and clinics to manage their health care needs.

Followed by question number four; What changes do you seek to school programs for children in grades K-12?

Melissa Dart

At the Goochland forum, she talked about her concerns for education in the Commonwealth [and the nation] with Betsy DeVos in charge of the Department of Education, and Congressional Republicans ready to support her in diverting Federal monies to charter schools. And since public education is already under funded at the state level, the House of Delegates should be careful not to divert addition monies from Virginia’s public schools.

It needs to be said that her response came on the heels of one of the strangest sequences of questions from the audience for the candidates, a chain of events which started with Dr. Dhakar who was asked about his faith, followed by Melissa about her religion.  Questions that were so out in left field, that Lizzie remarked later at another meeting “I was floored when I heard them.”

To their credit, both candidates handled those questions well, with the Dr. Dhakar saying he believed in karma, while Melissa talked about the need for a true separation of church and state, irony’s which from all appearances were lost on the audience. 

In her interview with the CV, she talked about a need for schools not to just prepare students for college, but also offer skills training, and vocational programs, particularly those with apprenticeships. She also talked less emphasis on teaching to the test [coincidentally mandated by the General Assembly, via the dreaded SOL’s] and returning the freedom and flexibility that teachers need to teach our children.

Lizzie Drucker-Basch

 We are still funding the state education system at 2009 rates, and despite having a constitutional duty to fund K-12 education. The General Assembly has been playing shell game with lottery, literary, and general funds to coble together enough money to paying for educating the children of Virginia, deeds which have reduced funding by approximately $628 per student.

What I am charging hard for, is to make sure we exceed those [pre 2009] levels, since we are now funding our schools at pre-recession levels

It’s worth noting that in the second candidate forum at Goochland High School earlier this month, when talking about how our public schools deserve proper funding just  how hard she was grilled by several Republican poltroons armed with disingenuous questions along the lines of “since throwing money at the problem isn’t working, why should we spend more?” And when she responded by pointing out those questions were based on a false premise, that the state is already spending less on public education, and fully funding Virginia’s public school system is a constitutional requirement. When the real question should be, why aren’t we fully funding our public schools?

Afterwards she added state funding doesn’t include any funding for administrative staff, forcing localities to make up the difference. Given the resulting silence, it wasn’t clear if the flacks were suffering from cognitive dissonance, or didn’t get the response they were hoping for.

Apparently short circuited by the argument that investing in our children through a high quality public education system is worthwhile, and for decades it has proven to be one the best ways to secure our future.

And perhaps better left unsaid given the audience, was the obvious reality that Republicans in the House of Delegates have been systematically under funding our public school system for over nine years, and that these actions are a strongest indication of the lengths they are willing to go to serve their free market ideology, oblivious to anything, except keeping their wealthy benefactors afloat while robbing from future generations.

And finally, What infrastructure projects would you prioritize?

Editor’s Note: This question more than any other highlights the stark contrast between these two ladies and the depth of the Republican candidate’s ignorance and hypocrisy, where they all spouted variations of the free market will take care of everything. With some like Graven Craig being so ideologically “pure” that he’s even against private/public projects like Louisa’s broadband initiative. Meanwhile Melissa and Lizzie clearly recognize the importance of communications infrastructure for education and a prosperous economy.

 Melissa Dart

We need to bring access to that last mile of connectivity to all parts of the state, especially rural areas like Louisa County. The lack of broadband is an issue which affects our ability to earn a living, our children’s education and even public safety.  Plain and simple, rural communities need access to these technological resources to compete in today’s economy.

We need broadband now, whether through Public/Private partnerships or some other means it has to happen.

 Lizzie Drucker-Basch

We need reliable, affordable broadband, and LTE, an abbreviation for (long term evolution) of high speed data service, a topic which cell phone users accessing the internet are painfully familiar with.  Access to broadband is a business and economic imperative, and an investment in our children’s education. The General Assembly needs to come up with initiatives and tax incentives for localities to promote broadband growth in rural areas like Louisa County, and that Louisa’s own broadband BB initiative should be supported by their delegate.

And finally, given what’s at stake, it’s appropriate to paraphrase from a blog run by one of Lizzie’s staff ­—the Republican party is on a dangerous trajectory, I am afraid to think of what will happen if they get their way with public education. What is important for us now, is that we act. Get your friends out to vote, and most importantly, don’t forget to vote on June 13th.

Jon Taylor

Another Meet the Candidates event

This past Saturday, I attended a Meet the Candidates event at Goochland High School for all eight of the candidates running for the open 56th House of Delegates seat. And in contrast to a previous “Meet the Candidates event in Mineral last month, there were many more questions from the audience. For their hard work, the Goochland County Tea Party, Goochland Republican Committee, and Goochland Democratic Party all deserve a hand for a well managed and informative event.

After the opening remarks, the candidates were randomly selected for which order they would speak, giving their opening remarks, and then taking as many questions from the audience as time allowed. And it should be noted that slightly more than half way through this forum, Congressman Dave Brat showed up, taking a seat in the back of the auditorium.

According to the organizers, he was not “invited” to this event and chose to crash the gate so to speak. And from all reports, this in-your-face “pay attention to me” action was very similar to what he and the entire Republican contingent pulled when they crashed a historical society parade in Bon Air several weeks ago.

And the response to his presence was mixed; from holding court with Keith Flannagan the chair of the Goochland Tea Party, and Graven Craig, an attorney and candidate from Louisa while the candidates spoke. His presence was so “disruptive” that Flannagan finally had to publicly acknowledge his presence between speakers.  And apparently the remaining Republican candidates must have thought this was their cue to audition for his approval/endorsement, because almost immediately they started spouting “Bratisms.”

With John McGuire  suddenly peppering his responses with “market forces“, “supply and demand,” And the next guy Jay Prendergast, started talking about “market based solutions“, increasing health care access through “free market,’ and finally, Graven Craig who went so far as to quote some of Brat’s BS economic statistics.

Prompting one person in the audience to say; “OK, every candidate since Dave Brat showed up, was spouting the Brat Bingo Lingo- maybe they had microphones in their ears, and were psychically channeling him, or sucking up to him.” After the candidates finished speaking, the mediator declared a brief bathroom break before their final summary. And yet another opportunity for Graven Craig to bolt up the aisle to confer with Brat.

During this brief intermission and immediately after Tina Spinella Winkler spoke to him about being unable to get a meeting along with asking him some pointed questions, he slipped out the back, avoiding any other members of the audience. And from his and presumably the other Republican candidate’s perspective, it was “Mission Accomplished,” since they now had working outline of how to play their greatest distractions … I mean present their astro-turfed positions.

In the not so distant past, Republican’s spoke in carefully calculated “code,” words designed to activate strong emotional responses from their supporters. Now in the case of John McGuire; they just go straight to self promoting videos, and in Matt Pinsker’s case espousing a barely concealed racism and hatred of others; particularly liberal democrats, minorities, and especially anyone who isn’t like them.

With one person commenting later that the “…others are probably harboring similar ideas; Pinsker’s just the first to say it so overtly.” And to a man, all of the Republicans demonstrated their lack of knowledge of the issues,  giving misleading and evasive answers, particularly the two candidates from Louisa County, George Goodwin and Graven Craig.

And a particular shout out has to go to Mr. Craig who demonstrated his cluelessness about how important  access to the internet is in rural areas, when responding to a question about broadband in rural areas, and how the model being used in Louisa might be applied in other areas, saying “I’m against private/public partnerships,” without the slightest explanation. Contemptuously dismissing the reality of the impact that having access to reliable and affordable internet has on education and economic development.

Yet another reminder of the extent to which he is imitating AFP’s and Brat’s brand of Prosperity gospel.

Not to be outdone, Dr. Dhakar and Matt Pinsker demonstrated their cluelessness and callousness; starting with the good Doctors  diatribe about making sure that welfare moms only have one kid in order to keep health care cost affordable, to Pinsker’s claims that “We have to cut health care,”  without a single word of explanation. Free market sound bytes which encapsulate the Republican’s problem free philosophy on virtually every issue.

As previously mentioned; Graven Craig has been ingratiating himself with Dave Brat’s Freedom Caucus and the Tea Party, and from all appearances is willing to say anything to prove that he’s a “disciple” of their faith, like these fliers his supporters were handing out at this event.

Keep in mind that all of these endorsements (on the left) for him are from various members of the Goochland Tea Party who have seized control of most of the levers of power in that county. Nor was it any coincidence that the last time he showed up at a public event in Louisa, it was with Brat at last year’s Celebrating Democracy Day at Louisa High school, along with a Goochland Tea Party member.

According to the event’s organizer, the Goochland supervisor “was not invited as a candidate,” and “came with party members,” whether that’s an indication that the local conservative bench in Louisa county is so thin that the only way to keep up appearances was to bring in outside help remains unclear.

And even before the “Great Disruptor” graced us with his presence, several of the question directed to certain candidates came from Republican flacks in the audience, and were clearly framed in such a way to point out that  they weren’t members of their tribe. Like the questions asked of Dr. Dhakar and Melissa Dart about their “faith,” questions which weren’t asked of any other candidates.

Another attempt to define certain candidates as being somehow “different” came from Republican operative, Mark Hile who’s long winded question was a clumsy attempt to get one of the Democratic candidates to “agree” that there were circumstances where privatizing our public school system might be justified.

And like the previous candidate forum in Mineral, Lizzie Drucker-Basch pointed out on several occasions that some of the questions she was being asked were so “loaded” as to be virtually meaningless let alone answerable. This was not a coincidence, since those questions originated from the same authoritarian mindset that has wholeheartedly embraced the Republican mantra… I mean creed.

Testaments of faith which work because they are designed to short circuit any rational thought, feeding directly into long standing social and economic resentments, and carefully packaged to maximize their supporter’s anger and sense of outrage.

And unlike the above meme, this is not a temporary state of mind for many conservatives; it’s a deeply ingrained part of their culture, one which has proven highly resistant to any change.  And of particular concern in this open 56th Delegate seat are the subtle racist and phobic slings which are constantly being “normalized” by conservatives.

And it is one of societies greatest social fictions,  a convenient distraction which keeps  people from realizing the true magnitude of their fear and hatred of “others,” one that gives them a them a space so safe that even a snowflake couldn’t melt in which to project those same unspoken attitudes onto other, particularly liberals.

An assortment of prosecution complex’s which helps their supporters maintain the illusion that only they are members of the chosen tribe, making them even more willing to defend their tribe against any attack, or inconvenient facts. Like how all of the Republican candidates are preaching a modern day adaptation of Dominionist prosperity gospel.  A world view which as far as I can tell permeates the entire Party, aided and abetted by an incurious local media who have somehow failed to notice that these quasi-religious attitudes are being co-opted by front groups like American’s for Prosperity.

Or that they are backing other radical Republican state delegate candidates; like Nick Freitas, and Dave LaRock along with Congressman Brat. Doing everything they can to project the appearance of AstroTurfed … I mean grassroots….err widespread support for their ideas.

Or they will be supporting which ever Republican survives this primary.

At least ones who are only interested in giving lip service to having any values, or at least ones which don’t conflict with AFP’s … I mean their corporate master’s agenda’s.

And it remains to be seen whether the people of Louisa will take advantage of this weekends Louisa Street Festival, or the Get out the Vote rally at the Louisa Arts Center to ask these candidates some hard questions before they cast their votes next Tuesday.

Jon Taylor

Editors Note: There will be two articles highlighting both of the Democratic candidates later this week.

When our worst nightmare is our president

Donald Trump is rapidly becoming the world’s worst nightmare. His latest outrage, unilaterally pulling the United States out of the Paris climate agreement, against the advice of most of his advisors and against the will of most Americans, continues his reckless pattern of irrational decision-making, fawning over strongmen and dictators, and ignoring the best interests of our country and the international community.

The United States would join Syria, which is somewhat busy with a civil war and ISIS, and Nicaragua, which didn’t think the Paris agreement went far enough, as the only countries in the entire world which are not part of the accord (there is considerable debate in the U.S. about whether the accord is a treaty requiring Senate approval, or an executive agreement, as Obama considered it—nonetheless, its guidelines are voluntary). This kind of myopic, xenophobic, irresponsibility is simply unacceptable. Like climate change, globalization is a fact of life, and mouthing stupid phrases like “make America great again,” is not going to improve the lives of any Americans.

The governors of New York, California and Washington, representing one-fourth of the American economy, are forming the United States Climate Alliance, a coalition of states devoted to upholding the Paris agreement and taking aggressive action on climate change. Along with many other cities and states, Governor McAuliffe has announced that Virginia will join this coalition. Our very own Congressman Dave Brat, on the other hand, remains Virginia’s chief Trump cheerleader.

We don’t want other leaders and other countries laughing at us anymore,” thundered Trump the other day, “and they won’t be.” Wrong, Donald. The entire planet has been laughing, and crying, ever since you were elected, and it is going to get worse, much worse. We have become the world’s laughingstock.

“Just returned from Europe. Trip was a great success for America. Hard work but big results!” Trump tweeted last week. Here’s what Germany’s top diplomat had to say about Trump’s first venture abroad:

Anyone who accelerates climate change by weakening environmental protection, who sells more weapons in conflict zones and who does not want to politically resolve religious conflicts is putting peace in Europe at risk. The short-sighted policies of the American government stand against the interests of the European Union. The West has become smaller, at least it has become weaker….”

Post-World War II academics and world leaders place the war’s start when Western Europe had neither the will nor the arms and equipment to resist Hitler’s demand to annex the Sudetenland—the German-speaking part of Czechoslovakia.

Heeding history’s lessons, including the American-led international response to Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, the Obama administration led the effort to impose international sanctions for Russia’s unilateral violation of Ukraine’s borders when it invaded and illegally annexed Crimea and sent Russian soldiers into other Russian-speaking regions of Ukraine. How ironic, that more than 75 years after the Second World War ended, the German Chancellor has announced that Europe may have to go it alone, because Trump wants to appease Putin’s ruthless aggression. Republican Party leaders not only wanted to follow a different policy on Crimea, but humble their domestic opponents who had been highly critical of Russia for its aggression and its covert operations in Ukraine, which included shooting down Malaysian Airlines flight 17, killing all 283 passengers and 15 crew. The opportunity the Russians saw to relieve themselves of world condemnation required a Republican electoral victory. Russian intelligence had long targeted American military, industrial and intelligence communities, but American democratic politics was as undecipherable to them as some American pundits have observed. The Russians had tools, but needed guidance. They needed someone to tell them where to do their dirty work.

The Russians obviously saw an opening and started early in developing a relationship between Russian intelligence operatives and the Trump campaign team. Every day we are learning more about who and what was involved. The Russians were desperate to have crippling international sanctions lifted. The Republican candidate expressed sympathy. Late last week, The Hill newspaper reported that Trump administration officials pressed State Department staffers to develop plans for removing sanctions against Russia almost immediately after Trump took office in January.

Michael Flynn, national security advisor to the Trump campaign, was at the head table sitting next to Vladimir Putin in a December 2015 anniversary dinner for a Russian TV channel. At the same table was Green Party Leader Jill Stein. It is alleged that Flynn and Stein received money from the Russians before, during, and after this event. It is noteworthy that subsequently, Stein’s vote totals in the crucial states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan were all greater than Clinton’s margin of defeat, and arguably denied Clinton an Electoral College victory, despite her winning the popular election by more than three million votes.

Which brings us to the Trump family Russian scandals and Donald’s love affair with Vladimir Putin, the ruthless dictator who wants to bring down not only the United States, but also the entire European Community. The Russian story won’t go away while the Trump family hides its financial dealings, including Trump’s refusal to release his tax returns, contrary to all his post-WWII predecessors. Allegations of Russian money-laundering through German banks muddy the water even further. Every day, the revelations of the collusion of Trump’s closest advisors with the Russians to subvert our election just get worse and worse. Where will it end?

“Don’t Tread on Me” is no longer the exclusive slogan of the Tea Party. “Don’t Tread on Me” is a motto that all Americans can, and should, embrace. Resist, insist, persist, enlist. Donald Trump is America’s worst nightmare.

Mike McClary

Editors Note: this article has been re-posted with the author’s permission and originally appeared here.

 

Cultural Assumptions and Irresponsible Journalism

After reading over the many letters supporting various Republican candidates in our local paper, the Central Virginian over the course of these past two months, it struck me not only how similar they were, but how many half-truths and exaggerations these “personal” endorsements contained.  Nor does our local paper appear to be immune from this form of revisionism. Take their two front page articles in last weeks edition; the candidate forum in Mineral, and the passing of the former chair of the Republican Party of Virginia

Perhaps they expect their readers to believe that after parroting Congressman Tom Garrett’s claim that he “…brought credibility and virtue back to the state GOP,” that they’ve done their duty. That nobody would remember the RPV’s toxic legacy under his leadership; which saw some of the most extreme deeds (voter gerrymandering and suppression) by the General Assembly and the most radical legislators (Garrett and Reeves) in living memory.

While the CV did note in their piece on the Mineral candidate forum that because of the Chamber of Commerce’s “concerns” about having a collegial affair, none of the candidates were asked any “difficult” questions. Yet somehow,  failed to notice that those measures affected everyone’s ability to communicate freely and openly.  And it’s precisely where local notions of “get along to go along” have come to mean something entirely different.

 It’s also worth noting that the CV’s lack of scrutiny about how this “event” was conducted was in direct contrast to printing Mr. Skare’s observations about learning more about the candidate’s by listening to them, and that some were “…looking for a job.”  As for their antediluvian claim that there are no “stark differences” between Republican candidates, it’ a convenient social convention … I mean fiction, one which pointedly ignores the reality that all of these Republican candidates are preaching variations of Dominionist prosperity gospel.

And if you’re unfamiliar with this constellation of pseudo-religious attitudes, you’re not alone. It’s a belief system among certain Christians which states that if one has faith in God, he will deliver security and prosperity. And only through faith, speech and deeds, and of course donations can they increase their own material wealth. And the Republican Party has tapped into that ideology, reinforcing it with their American’s for Prosperity flavored prosperity gospel.

It’s a  “philosophy” which has its roots in the fringe libertarian John Bircher movement of the 1950’s.  An ideology which has transformed from a myopic focus on limited government over the ensuing decades into something far more insidious and dangerous, a radical right organization, backed by an interlocking cartel of think tanks, research centers, and unlimited money.

Money from sources known and unknown, like the Koch brothers, who have made no secret over the years about their sponsorship of groups like; AFP, ALEC and multiple think tanks.  What most people don’t know is that the Koch’s have taken this game to an entirely different level, using the legal chicanery of 501c3 non-profit advocacy groups to conceal the sources of their funding of political groups and politician’s from the public eye.

The use of “Dark Money” has exploded since the Supreme Courts 2010 Citizen’s v. United decision, and as this past election made clear, the Koch’s aren’t the only billionaire’s playing this game. Like Robert Mercer, who through the use of data analytics, micro-targeting, social media and quite possibly Russian collusion, was able to spread his messages with surgical precision, by passing the Republican Party altogether.

With the final product being our first Manchurian Candidate … I mean useful idiot President. And since Republicans have always been the party of money and corporate interests, they have chosen to respond to this existential threat to our government by adopting a “if you cant’ beat them, join them” mindset, doubling down on every wild authoritarian and free market fantasy imaginable. Knowing full well that any standards of acceptable behavior have been and continue to be shattered by the Cheeto faced, ferret wearing, shitgibbon occupying the White House.

And the Koch’s have found their own way around this impasse, working behind the scenes in Congress to get legislation favorable to their interests and profits passed, using groups like ALEC and AFP to spread their propaganda to the masses.   At the some time, this “support” serves as a firewall for Republicans, particularly at the state level, where they don’t even need to speak in “code” to appeal to and control the faithful.

They can just use ideas provided by organizations like ALEC and AFP to give the appearance of having any values. Using words carefully crafted to project the vaguest notions of an unrestricted “free market,” and even less defined aspirational goals of “protecting our liberties,” and exercising “personal responsibility.”

And these distractions work, because they feed into lingering social, economic, and racial resentments, all carefully packaged to maximize their supporters anger and sense of outrage

like this flier from one of the Republicans running for the 56th House of Delegates seat.

What most of their supporters appear to be unaware of is that whenever the Republicans anything goes free market interpretation of our laws, the constitution etc are implemented, the result is almost always the exact opposite of whatever they are claiming to be protecting.

Republicans long ago ceased to the Party of conservatism, they don’t conserve anything, and are the instrument of their wealthy masters, using their willful denial of basic scientific and economic principles to shamelessly promote the unconscionable accumulation and hoarding of wealth. Unbridled greed which is driving massive increases in the use of fossil fuels which will only accelerate the devastation they are wreaking on the planet.

Whenever they are asked about that discrepancy between their stated positions and their actions, their standard response has is to provide a litany of half truths, exaggerations and distractions from the reality of their Party’s actions.

Much like George Goodwin’s claims that he “helped” get legislature through the General Assembly. Perhaps, but since he’s unwilling to acknowledge or take any “credit” for legislative debacles like Garrett’s infamous “Nunchuckbill, it does raise questions about just how much influence over Party extremists like Peake, Reeves; and now Congressman Garrett, or legislative affairs did he have?

Speaking of extremists; it’s been said that you can judge someone by the company they keep, and Graven Craig has been very busy brown-nosing with the Freedom Caucus and the Tea Party, embracing their retrograde ideas, determined to show that he’s a “disciple” of the faith.

And it remains to be seen if the recently concluded Candidate Forum at Goochland High School this past Saturday attracts many Louisa County residents, or succeeds in changing their minds.

But should you find yourself undecided on the candidates then make it a point to come to the Louisa Street Festival on the 10th of June, and meet some of these candidates, and ask them hard questions.

You will learn far more from watching them relate to others than you would from the CV’s  candidate “profiles,” or a thousand opinions.

Jon Taylor

Editors Note: The shorter version of this letter which was submitted to our local paper, the Central Virginian was not published in their June 8th “rebuttal” edition.

Nor was it any surprise to see them go out of their way to promote their preferred narrative,  changing the rules they posted on their editorial page the previous week.

As we do each election year, The Central Virginian will impose restrictions on letters of a political nature to ensure fairness. Election letters to the editor will be accepted through Monday, May 29. We will only allow rebuttal letters in the June 8 issue and they are due by June 5 at 5 p.m

A problem free philosophy which starts with crowding out any local letters, filling 2/3’rds of their op-ed page with syndicated content, accompanied by a Q & A for the candidates that was so generic, it was the least they could do to “inform” their readers.

 

 

 

 

Free speech and journalistic responsibility

Jim McConnell’s article on the 5/9/17 Brat Town Hall, “Teeming with anger: Town hall signals leftward shift” was disappointing. In our country, we have the luxury of Freedom of the Press. Because of that freedom, the press has the duty to investigate and inform. McConnell took the easy way out that day and chose to entertain, by writing about the crowd reaction instead of digging deeper to understand why they were reacting in that manner. Did he miss the fact that Brat consistently holds Town Halls on private property, this time a Christian church, when there were two Chesterfield County public schools across the road and dozens more public schools in Brat’s district?

Why didn’t McConnell grasp that because the event was on private property, the property owners could and did prohibit signs, posters, banners or flyers even though the VA ACLU had reminded Brat on two occasions that prohibiting them was a violation of the attendees’ Free Speech? Did McConnell miss the fact that the event was only open to ticket holders?

That those on the wait list were denied entry even though there were dozens of empty seats inside? That the attendees were not permitted to speak to Brat directly but had to submit their questions on note cards which were then pre-selected and read to Brat? That Brat’s co-host stood up and angrily scolded the audience, “You all be quiet now. This is MY Town Hall.”

The audience was not booing at God when Brat said, “Our rights are God-given.” They booed because they knew that our right to Free Speech does not come from God, It comes from our Constitution. The audience’s anger should be unsurprising because they fully realized their First Amendment rights were being violated, even if McConnell didn’t. The First Amendment, specifically Freedom of the Press was already in the headlines that day.

A West Virginia reporter was arrested simply for asking HHS Secretary Tom Price a question, so apparently McConnell is missing the big picture. In a May 16, 2017, RTD article, “Trumpcare could lead to cuts in services for elderly, people with disabilities in Virginia” detailed the disastrous impact it will have on Virginians. The RTD reported, “When asked to comment for the story, U.S. Rep. Dave Brat, R-7th, refused to do so unless he was guaranteed three unedited paragraph in the Richmond Times-Dispatch.”  Brat voted in favor of the “bill,” and has now taken his First Amendment assault to a new level with his attempt to stifle the Free Press.

What will it take for McDonnell and the Chesterfield Observer to see that politicians like Brat are engaged in guerrilla warfare on the First Amendment? Their threats are rarely as overt as Price’s, or Brat’s demands on the RTD. More often they are insidious like Brat’s violations of his constituents’ rights to Freedom of Assembly, Freedom of Religion and Free Speech in his Town Halls on the pretext of crowd control.

James Madison enshrined Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Assembly, and Freedom of Religion as the very first Amendment to the Constitution because he believed these to be the most important freedoms we have, the freedoms on which all others are based.

Whether you agree with an individual’s political beliefs or not, the individual’s right to have them and express them must be protected. Our First Amendment rights are guaranteed but can’t be taken for granted. They must be re-won by every generation. This is what democracy looks like.

When will McConnell and the Chesterfield Observer uphold their duty to investigate, inform and hold the politicians accountable?

Maggie Dolan

Editor’s Note: This post was submitted to the Chesterfield Observer three weeks ago, and was finally published here. The author has granted permission to re-post her letter on Blue Louisa. It is also worth noting that they also printed this just below her letter.

Brat pack doesn’t play fair

Recent news coverage of Rep. Dave Brat’s town hall [Teeming with Anger, May 17th] focused on the display of anger rather than the cause, questioning if the left was becoming divisive – nothing could be further from the truth. While opinions differ as to the best tactic, we all agree the tea party Republican’s are a detriment to our community and must go.

One reason is that they don’t fight fair.

An example of this occurred during the recent Bon Air parade, when against explicit rules of “no campaigning,” they marched with “vote for” signs of eight Republican candidates, from Congressman to Board of Supervisors, plastered on two trucks, billboards in the beds, and stickers on their chests. Brat even stuck “Brat” stickers on babies, his photographer snapping photos with parade-goers, some of which refused to shake his hand.

Liberal Women of Chesterfield County (LWCC) carried signs honoring our suffragette history. Katie Sponsler Democratic nominee for the House 66th, dressed in Victorian costume and handed out candy, instead of asking for votes. She is running against a delegate who hasn’t had a challenger since 1995. Jenefer Hughes marched with nothing indicating her run for Commissioner of Revenue. Ben Person-Nelson’s request to march was denied due to the no-campaigning rule.

All of the Democratic candidates honored the rules. All three would have greatly benefited from name recognition if they had disregarded the rules like the Republicans chose to do. Yet the Republican’s bad manners won’t make the news.

They might have not screamed F-you at a town hall, but that’s exactly what their actions spoke.

Despite this blatant rule breaking, they had the audacity to complain to an even volunteer that LWCC was allowed to march, implying we may cause trouble. Often, liberals get painted as disruptive. This week alone, LWCC donated 180 reams of paper to area schools, and paid off student lunch debts. That won’t make the news either.

For those of you who will say, I’m just a liberal making a big deal out of nothing- the Bon Air Historical Society which hosts the parade, emailed me immediately afterwards and said the Republican’s actions were unacceptable, and because of them all future politician’s were banned from future parades.

They called LWCC a “great addition,” and thanked us for adhering to the rules, inviting us back next year. We did receive a warm welcome from the crowd, with cheer and people exclaiming how grateful they were to see us in Bon Air.

While some might dispute that these tea party Republicans are hypocrites in preaching generosity, the creating stingy destructive policies, it’s certainly clear they are hypocrites in complaining about loud town halls and women honoring Victorian suffragettes in a parade when they can’t even be bothered to follow the clear rules of the parade.

These are men and women that we’ve entrusted to create laws for all Virginians; shouldn’t we be able to trust them to abide by the simple rules of a hometown parade.

Kim Drew Wright

Editor’s Note: This post originally appeared here, in the May 31st edition of the Chesterfield Observer, and is re-posted with the author’s permission.

It should also be noted that many of Ms. Wrights points in her letter were reinforced by the fact that the Observer chose to print these two letters the previous week, presumably as the “conservative” response to their slanted May 17th article.

Biased coverage of Town Halls

I’m writing in response to Jim McConnell’s article Teeming with Anger: Town hall Signals Leftward Shift. I attended this town hall and am well aware of the many elements involved to make the audience appear “unruly.”

The backstory: Dave Brat and Amanda Chase chose to hold their town hall in Chase’s church–private property–instead of at one of the two public schools directly across the street, or one of the many public schools in Chesterfield County. The choice to use a private venue effectively-legally-ensured several things: it made a ban on signs allowable, it made protesting on the grounds a legal offense, it made the pastor feel it was within his right to lead the town hall with a Christian prayer, and it made Amanda Chase feel it was ok to admonish tax paying constituents for their “unruly behavior” in HER town hall.

Further, instead of allowing and encouraging a serious back and forth Q&A, our elected officials forced their constituents to write questions on note cards to be submitted beforehand for their perusal and then didn’t allow the questioner a microphone to talk. Brat, especially, frustrated attendees with a series of non-answers to serious questions, especially questions concerning the recently and narrowly House passed AHCA. He did NOT answer the many clear and succinct questions he was asked about it. Chase’s answer that “church charity will take care of our country’s health care needs” was breathlessly out of touch with the reality of health care complexity and needs in our nation.

The “unruly” behavior that took place happened as a direct result of the strict and demeaning rules placed on the town hall participants. These deliberate decisions on the part of our elected representatives were not meant to encourage free speech. They were meant to squash it into submission.

THESE are the reasons why the town hall was “rowdy,” NOT, as McConnell implies, because we Democrats are defensive, belligerent, and antagonistic by nature. “Liberal” and “left” are not synonymous with ignorance, immorality, or disrespectful any more than “conservative” and “right” are synonymous with racist, narrow-minded, or patriotic.

Much of the country is teeming with anger right now. Town halls across the country look exactly like this one did because of similar free speech constrictions placed on them by our elected officials. Mr. McConnell’s choice of words makes his article—and him—appear uninformed and biased, not what we expect and need from news journalists.

Kate Flinn

Editor’s Note: This post was submitted to the Chesterfield Observer several weeks ago, but was never published. The author has granted permission to re-post her letter on Blue Louisa.

Meeting the Candidates, or another Dog and Pony Show?

For those of you who couldn’t attend the “Meet the Candidates” forum hosted by the Louisa Chamber of Commerce at the Mineral VFW last week, other than the opportunity to hear the two Democratic candidates speak, I can’t you missed much.

It was a tightly controlled affair with all of the candidates limited to just a handful of questions. Nor was it any coincidence that those questions were framed in such a way as to force the direction of the candidates responses.

And of the roughly fifty people who attended this “event,” the crowd was split fairly evenly between assorted campaign staff, local Republican faithful, a handful of VFW members, along with ten or so progressives. Six Republican candidates attended this event with Graven Craig sending in a “representative” from his law practice, Torry Williams to stand in for him.

And in such a crowded field, it didn’t take long for two of the  candidates; Matt Pinsker and Jay Prendergast to demonstrate that they had no business running for public office.  And  neither John McGuire nor Dr. Dhakar did much to separate themselves from the pack.

More relevantly for the people of Louisa, neither of our two local Republicans candidates (or stand- ins) were particularly impressive. Their remarks were at best non-responsive, and often times little removed from a random collection of talking points.

While operating within the constraints of the forum, both of the Democrats responses to the questions were detailed and nuanced, and clearly emphasized their different areas of expertise; from Melissa’s knowledge of the Health Care system,

 

to Lizzie’s grasp of educational issues.

And of the three questions taken from the audience, two came from Republican supporters, with the last question of the day coming from RW talk radio host, John Fredericks, who frequently has Dave Brat as a guest on his show.

(5-24-17 Meet the Candidates event at Mineral VFW)

Which brings us to the topic of; which of these Republicans is most likely to get their Party’s nomination? If the number of fliers you have been receiving in your mailbox these past few weeks is any indication, both Dr Dhakar, and George Goodwin are prepared to spend as much money as necessary to influence that outcome.

And while Dhakar is not well known outside of his county, Goodwin is well known in Party circles and was able to use this familiarity to ensconce himself into the General Assemblies … I mean the Republican Party’s legislative process.

For the past few months, Goodwin has been claiming that he was instrumental in helping getting several bills get through sub committees and committees in both chambers. Perhaps, but since he’s unwilling to acknowledge let alone take “credit” for legislative debacles like Uncle Tom Garrett’s SB 1130Switchblade and Nunchuckbill  one has to ask just how much “influence” over party extremists like Garrett and Reeves or legislative affairs did he really have?

Speaking of extremists, it’s long been said that you can judge someone by the company they keep, and like Uncle Tom, Craven … err Graven Craig considers himself a “Cuccinelli conservative” and from all appearances is doing everything possible to further ingrate himself with the Tea Party’s and the Freedom Caucuses and their radical agendas.

(5­-25-17 Fundraiser for Rep. Louie Gohmert, with “special guests” Dave Brat and Graven Craig)

Now one can reasonably “argue” that the Chamber of Commerce’s primary job is to promote business, their questions would reflect that focus.  Perhaps, but since none of the Republican candidates were asked any question on more sensitive topics, such as; Women’s rights and Public Safety vs. 2nd Amendment rights etc., it remains to be seen how well they will fare with a larger audience at Goochland High School next Saturday.

That being said, keep in mind that Goochland County is a Tea Party stronghold, and in the past few years they have taken over most of the counties levers of power. And since they have been actively promoting this Meet the Candidates event since late April while we’re just learning about this event, it shouldn’t come as any surprise to learn that they see this event as a prime opportunity for them to create the “just-in-time candidate exposure and information we need” … I mean perception of support for their candidates.

And since this is the second year in a row they and the Goochland Republicans, in conjunction with the Goochland Democrats have sponsored an event like this, and it remains to be seen is whether that’s a recipe for confusion over who’s running this event.  Or even if it assures that the questions will be as tightly controlled as they were at the Chamber of Commerce’s event in Mineral.

And if you can’t make it to this event, there will be a Meet and Greet  for Melissa Dart at a private home on the first of June in Louisa County, along with a phone banking for Lizzie Drucker at Floozies on the 6th.  So unless any other public events come up between then and the June 13th primary, the last opportunity you will likely have to speak with either of the Democratic candidates running for the 56th House of Delegates before the primary will be the very first Louisa Street Festival on the 10th of June.

Jon Taylor

 

Why Dave Brat is under attack

I just received an e-mail from Dave Brat requesting a campaign donation because he is “under attack” for supporting the Republican Healthcare Act. Instead of being under attack, Brat needs to be voted out of office because of that support.

Under the Republican Healthcare Act, insurance companies will be allowed to charge older people up to three times more than younger people. Approximately 24 million people will lose their health insurance. Medicaid will be substantially cut and help for those making less than $30,000 will be eliminated. Funding for Planned Parenthood will be eliminated, as well as coverage for childbirth, which currently costs around $30,000.

The list of “preexisting conditions” will cover an enormous range of health issues. Cancer, heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, acne, Alzheimer’s, anemia, asthma, cerebral palsy, hepatitis, Parkinson’s Disease and renal failure are just a few of the other conditions that insurance companies may determine to be preexisting and choose not to cover. What good is insurance it if doesn’t cover the majority of health problems?

Brat also supports building a wall between the United States and Mexico at an estimated cost of $21 billion. This wall is not necessary and will do more harm than good. It will cause loss of revenue for S. border towns. We need to build our economy, not reduce it.

Twenty-one billion dollars would be better spent by hiring hundreds more border patrol personnel to physically cover the border, thereby eliminating border access by illegal aliens and getting rid of unemployment.

Sorry, Dave, you won’t be getting a penny of my money.

Deanna Nicosia

Editor’s Note: This first appeared in the May 25th edition of the Central Virginian, and is re-posted with the author’s permission, and is only available via hard copy or online to paying subscribers.